Monday, May 5, 2014

Blowing up the big bang theory. Yes a relative vacuum would form at the center of a massive all encompassing explosion like the big bang.

I am working out a simple proof to show that the big bang never happened.  It comes from Isaac Newton actually.  Newton as everyone is aware defined gravity as a force of course the big bang theory sways in the direction of Einstein's path of least resistance space time model of warped space.  The problem is that Newton's equations actually work.  We can't get anything up in orbit without them. If we start the cosmos out as this concentration of all mass an energy into a single unit that is the size of a golf ball or even fits on top of a pin it gets there because the big bang theory says it has infinite gravity and infinite mass (as infinite as the universe that is) Well then this sphere of singularity then has to behave like an object that possesses gravity.  Even if there is nothing at all in it's environment not even empty space when it goes bang an blows up like a huge bomb it has to go from the state of being at rest to in motion.  The problem is that we know for a fact that massive objects with much gravity  are in a state of motion, internal motion which and behave as if they do exhibit what newton saw as the force of gravity. 
The problem is we now even see that if black holes exist they are active .  That is only part of the proof.  The main part comes from the law of equal and opposite reactions in physics.  If something blows up it actually leaves a vacuum at the center of the explosion that will have one of those equal and opposite reactions.  In the atmosphere you can see that happening in an explosion because the air itself is thrust out from the center of the explosion causing a vacuum to appear till it later rushes back in toward the center.  Well blow up the singularity and suddenly you have a vast amount of mass and energy spewing out form the center immediately leaving a relative vacuum of the assumed singularity stasis  at the center.  So actually the explosion of the big bang would be a lot more messy than one giant eruption.  Taking that and modeling it into the theory it may kill the big bang theory all together.  The reason why goes back to how and why the entire universe, all mass, energy and space should be concentrated into The smallest possible unit of space time.  If it is gravity that does it then it will have the same equal and opposite reactions you would see if the sun or the earth blew up.

when a star blows up it also should have a feedback reaction, as per equal and opposite reaction as to have a relative vacuum form at the center or near the center .  To go from a state of stasis to one of everything suddenly being in motion in relationship to everything else and you can pretend that space time itself would not start to ripple or sustain the forces of equal and opposite reactions. 

Thursday, November 14, 2013

What is the probability of a vacuum in centrifigual stratification?

Went back to working on the dimensional expansion proof/ thesis. 
Wondering if Water above a dam has any properties that make it different than water below the dam that one can assess at the higher elevation that one cannot detect in it at the lower elevation and yes there might actually be something to that.  Certainly it is heat energy that gets water to the top of ice covered mountains as precipitation to begin with that gets it to higher elevations though it does not retain heat energy necessarily and certainly not nearly as much heat energy as it had to become humidity in the first place.
What is becoming clear is there actually is a difference between water at different levels of elevation given gravity as we experience it here on earth and probably elsewhere too.  Because of angular momentum centrifugal force or angular momentum- water has it's proper zone in the centrifugal stratification layers so water being higher or statistically out of its most probably range which is apparently sea level on earth to about 40,000 ft under the ocean surfaces means it is out of place more at higher elevations than lower elevations. So the bulk of it will end up in the right place at the liquid or frozen states in exactly the same causation as it would find it self in range in a centrifuge test tube given enough angular momentum to separate particles by mass, specific gravity,  density etc.   I had sort of realized that dimensional expansion has a positive and negative  polarity  and now I can start to prove it because if gravity is the opposite of centrifugal force / centripetal force than they counter act each other as opposite ends of the same dimensional expansion reaction that is because they both end up with that stratification of densities that is exactly the same but in reverse. So one end is more dimensionally expanded toward the nucleus and protons of atoms verses electrons at the other end .  Sub atomic particles  also stratified in the mirror image of each other. 
After realizing I can get a proof out of that that I started to wonder if Helium and hydrogen atoms just have less density and escape from the earth's atmosphere or if their escape is  promoted by the angular momentum layering caused by gravity. If hydrogen and helium find a sort of normal numbers per cubic kilometer of "outer space" and that is the same everywhere in the cosmos then there is yet another indicator.  Maybe those atoms are the metric of empty space?  And then as for angular momentum and stratification it could be that galaxies and even the entire cosmos is itself stratified in layers as a result?
What all of this means is there is actually positive verses negative dimensional expansion due to the exact same forces of either one in that stratification and it is a property of potentially the entire cosmos.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Getting Towards A Simple Understanding of Quantum Gravity.

The proof is quickly coming together:

Quantum Gravity and dimensional expansion are definitely intimately linked.  Every thing in the universe is moving. Most of it at high velocity and a lot of it if not most of it accelerating , constantly accelerating or just in a state of being an object in motion that stays in motion because none are really at rest even though our perception maybe that they are.  It is a law of nature that objects experiencing acceleration or in motion are not going to be able to  in empty space where there are no metrics to determine distance or time.  We have metrics we use to measure in the medium of space and time full of points of determination, mile stones, clock ticks and all the usual ways we do it.  The objects in motion however are not really aware of their motion and yet they will be if they should collide with some other object or energy field.  Collisions at high velocity can lead to explosive  consequences of destruction even when one object is relatively stationary in relationship to the other.  That means that even if objects in motion are "unaware" of necessarily being in motion they are dimensionally expanded so that when they do collide they become a train wreck of atoms/ subatomic particles that are either being pushed from behind by thrust or pulled by a locomotive ahead of them.  It is the inherent dimensional expansion of a constant velocity or a state of acceleration which means they are even more dimensionally expanded  that leads to the force of destruction in a collision.  How then do we measure dimensional expansion without having a collision to determine what dimensional expansion is?  I don't know but I have an idea for a new instrument that can tell maybe.  Yes it is another one of my stupid space guns or lasers in this case.  Of course orthodox physics will tell you that the tell tale sign is red shift.  I think it may be a form of refraction or diffraction that should vary according to what might be thought of as absolute velocity/ acceleration verses what ever is the  state of rest.  Rest?  Nothing is at rest.  This is a  major concern for the results of super collider research simply because the instruments may not be properly calibrated yet.

Dimensional expansion is all about vacuumology and what the true state of a vacuum is .  Mater creates space as we know it and nothing can create as much space as a complete train wreck of  a head on high velocity collision  where two solid object completely obliterate each other.  Say you have a 1000 light year long solid metal cylindrical  traveling at 1 light year per 10 years and an identical one traveling from the opposite direction at the same rate then collide in a perfect head on collision then every single atom in each over the 1000 light year span of the identical colliding cylinders will be affected because all of them have been dimensionally expanded.  The assumption is the two cylinders would collide head on so they would destroy each other with so much momentum they would continue to burn each other up in a collision that would last the length of 1000 light years in length at their combined velocity.  You do the math on how long it would take.  Its like two cars colliding head on. the tail ends of each car are not immediately affected and much of the energy of motion dissipates in destruction of the front ends of the cars but that is at low velocity compared to what I am describing.  It means sub atomic particles are dimensionally expanded as they are connected in the cylinders , cars, space objects and theses can be used to measure gravity just the same.  Yes Gravity which is operates in a similar manner.

 Dimensional expansion is absolutely indistinguishable  in an object with gravity as it is in that object in motion at some rate of acceleration or set velocity.  That is how we get back to those Xeon space craft engines that work on the basis of negative charges. Thrust and dimensional expansion are the same as ordinary motion as our laser or space gun meter  measures it.     Want to add time to the quantum gravity proof go back to those two 1000 light year long cylinders as it take x number of light years for them to vaporize each other over the entire 2000 light year length of both together.   Now I can go and look at exsiting super collider empirical collision data and get proof  without bothering to look at the scatter diagrams.  It is not the scatter that maters  to show what quantum gravity really is but something else.  I sense we want to see where more basic particles go in a high velocity collision.  Hydrogen atoms might be a good measuring stick of sorts in a collision to see how far the electrons stray verses the protons at variable comparative rates of velocity or do this with subatomic particles and then pattern a statistical chart that gives some more absolute idea of what Newtonian "Rest" really is.  Is rest in our universe what an absolute vacuum is?   Of course rest has this built in time component. We know an object staying at rest is like that pendulum clock pendulum that is not moving.  Absolute Zero anyone?  Clearly a total absolute vacuum has no electro magnetic energy at all  affecting it so it should be at absolute zero.

I will have it figured out soon.  I am getting closer and closer to being able to define quantum gravity working with these basic parameters and anti gravity simply being the exact opposite of gravity which is like a sublimating slow motion explosion from a core object as if we were to show a video of gravity in action in reverse that would be the most simple explanation and of course we get to a state like that with a collision  too.  Small collisions augment gravity's pull but big ones will obliterate the gravitational object.   


Friday, November 8, 2013

Quantum Gravity is about to be revealed!

Every Star , thanks to gravity retaining most plasma acts like a larger version of a Xeon Gas Rocket thrust engine. That will lead to a proof. ( just a few kinks to work out . I can build the proof on relativity with it's errors or just switch it to the dimensional expansion model  of the thermodynamic thesis given the radiometer proof)
I figured out the proof for what might be called quantum gravity last night. I simply divide vacuum force in to positive and negative dimensional expansion/ compression variables of the same stratification process and then relate these to the thrust of contained Xeon gas in Xeon gas rocket engine (for easy empirical evidence to show how it works). All thrust has the exact same effect of putting negative charges against negative charges and that is what the statistical probability of centrifugal stratification is all about as I call the process dimensional expansion. Gravity is a product of that relationship of subatomic particles and the great thing about the xeon gas engine is the unreactive gas expansion and how it relates to a vacuum. It is the same vacuum the sun's plasma retains due to 500 times the gravity of Earth's. The galaxies are appearing to be part of an expanding universe precisely because their net physical activity/gravity is going to give them negative charges to repel each other in most cases. Then you track the apparent motion of these to see just what a spherical xeon gas engine does in terms of propelling a star in motion. It is all going to fit especially with the theory of relativity given a couple of corrections and modifications.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Travel Anywhere Instanteously? Colapsing and Expanding the Vacuum.

I am about to devise an experiment to see if this is possible in more than just theory.  Since there is only 1 single unit of empty space in the cosmos and since that empty space has no power to create dimensions nor to meter them it begins to explain why some of these quantum experiments showing minute particles of mater  simultaneously being in more than one position / location in space at the same time.  Actually the present day model of the atom shows that electrons can be virtually in all positions surrounding the nucleus at the same moment.  We know that mater and it's allied "forces" including electrical, magnetic and gravitational forces create the empty space we know of in the cosmos including the empty space thought be between the core and the exterior of atoms and in areas scrubbed clean of mater by gravity.  The space we know of seems to be encumbered .  Although either is out of favor we see concepts like Higgs Boson fields or particles and even a medium for gravity wave propagation proposed or believed in.

Vacuumology  is the theory of what the properties of the empty space of a vacuum really is in physical reality.  The thesis as already stated is that since there is just one unit of empty space and all aspects of it are part and parcel of  one  big space that is seemingly being stretched  and defined into existence by mater it really means that it may be possible to travel virtually anywhere or to multiple locations simultaneously.   Already there is evidence that some tiny sub atomic particles or units of energy said to act as particles doing this.  What if it were possible for much larger physical objects to do precisely the same thing?  It actually might be.  The proposed experiment  aims to disrupt the "fabric of space" controlled by mater within that space.  Einstein's frames of reference idea that the fabric of space being warped by the presence of mass and gravity has always been curious as a concept.  If that notion of relativity as he defines it is true or even just sort of true then there actually is something out in space that can be disrupted to essentially expand or contract space. 

The experiments proposed has to do with being  at the center of a powerful explosion and not have it as thrust behind your traveling space vehicle.  Certainly the point of being at the center of an explosion in order to expand or contract space means you want to be insulated from the force of the blast and that is a big problem but not for a sensor or a detector designed to do just that.  Unfortunately the power of the explosion has to be at the upper most limit . It might be possible to do the experiments in a super collider reconfigured for that purpose or it might require a full scale hydrogen fusion reaction  preferably outside of the influence of the earth's orbit and maybe even at a distance from other planets more distant from the sun.    Imagine sending out a space probe and blowing it up past the orbit of Saturn in order to instantaneously have a payload arrive here back on earth simultaneously and elsewhere too. Even just to deliver a signal ahead of the speed of light would prove it was simultaneous.  There is a good chance this is going to work.  What needs to be disrupted in space to send a probe to a distant galaxy a few billion light years away?  Something we are not exactly sure what.  When our device arrives instantly at that distant galaxy how big is it in proportion to the galaxy?  First we have added no more energy to it before sending it at the same time since space does not have any understanding of metric dimensions The device could arrive at a point in space with entirely new dimensions.  Second navigation is a big unknown.  Traveling so far away we would not be able to communicate with the probe unless we devised a way to send signals by disrupting the fabric of space and that is again some kind of explosive force?    Sounds crazy or like movie science fiction with special effects it is not. It is not .  This is not the thesis of having a black hole in your wake or a hole in space with a  black hole event horizon.

  This is a much more simple Vacuumology  observation that space has properties that are created by what is in the environment of space and that beyond that there is a hidden vacuum that gives subatomic particles a universal means of transit where everywhere is anywhere. It is one thing to think of electrons as being fast or nearly the speed of light. One electron attached to a hydrogen atoms has to cover a vast amount of territory on the surface almost simultaneously everywhere at a terrific distance from the nucleus center of that atom.   If we were to view this electron in motion with something like a frame by frame stop action camera we would see it hit almost every position  on the surface of the sphere of it's orbit at one time.  As time frames go in films when we slow them down we see all the holes in the motion otherwise we see in motion picture magic.  With the time frame pictures of the electrons we see a probability dimensioned energy field more than we see the particle electron.  Our whole concept of empty space is built on our frames of reference at our macro physical level of existence in the cosmos.  If we could disrupt the way the electron in the hydrogen atom behaves we could see it behave entirely in a different way.  It has been done of course but we have not done it at the macro level yet.  I am working on an even more simple experiment to show the potential of having objects be in two or more places at one time even with considerable distance between those locations.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

What Is Vacuumology? It Is The Study Of The Physics Of Empty Space.

Vacuumology  is the study of the physics of empty space in the cosmos, as it relates to mater and mathematics.   It is not the study of either which might be where Higgs Boson field theory is leading now that it has ascended to Nobel prize worthiness.  It is about the pervasive vacuum in the cosmos we call empty space.  Of course the vacuum is relative to how "hard" it is.  We think of space as being the place where mater and energy resides. Outer space is anything but a void and inner space between an atomic nucleus and the outer electrons seems to be an enormous void.  What empty space really is actually stranger than we would otherwise wish to visualize it.  We confuse space with distance or with room as we find it in a house or as a designated area on a map or as anything outside the earth's atmosphere but space is a funny thing because it actually seems to be created by the metrics and probabilities of nature.  Atoms seem to create their own space just as stars and planets do.  When it comes to concepts like "Space Time" we think of empty space being warped at least as a visual analogy our point of view maybe what is warped because the space we think we know in the solar system seems to be carved out or created by the Sun and the Planets and maybe does not exist at all them.  

What exactly is space then if  a gravitational field from a star makes it possible or subatomic particles maybe the only thing that accounts for its existence?  Why do gas molecules disperse in a vacuum or do they disperse the way we think they do?  What are the metrics of empty space without mater to mile post it's metric features?  Why would space be infinite in an expanding universe when a vacuum lacks the pressure material stuff has and seem always to yield to the  pressure from outside closed vacuum cell?

I am soon going to publish here the rules of empty space.  I started it but then ran into the gas diffusion problem.  The problem is we don't always see gas diffusing  in the images from modern astronomy. Diffusion of gas in a vacuum is actually stranger than expected and I have to figure out why.  Could be something like transpiration and it could be that a gas without interactions from the spectrum of electro magnetic energy leads to a soup of distant diffuse atoms and molecules of freezing cold plasma that has the properties of trillions and trillions of  super conductors?    This is just speculation because I am now doing to work to find out exactly what all the rules of empty space are.  Will this lead to a new law of physics?  Probably not.  That is because empty space and vacuum states are already built into science we already have developed.  When we measure specific gravity of objects by putting them in deep water in a bath tub Archimedes style we know what to expect in advance but when we stick the same comparative objects into empty space there is no displacement as there is with water and air in that ancient experiment.  The two objects occupy the same empty space and we have no trouble with that.  We take it for granted because we are certain that there is nothing at all special about nothing.  Then we find out that space can be subjected to pressure when we observe objects that confine it with space able to be condensed to a solid state.  We know that very dense material objects have contained within a perfect vacuum .  The more dense the more electrons can be forced out from the proximity of the center.  If we collapse a balloon by sucking all the air out of it then we see a vacuum becoming a solid.  The air removed is replace from the vacuum and empty space shrinks under the air pressure surrounding it.